YET ANOTHER CIA DOCUMENTARY TO "DEBUNK" THE CIA LED ASSASINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY
I just finished watching a ducumentary called "THE KENNEDY ASSASINATION, BEYOND CONSPIRACY". Why do they continue making documentaries to debunk "the false statements in the movie JFK"? If this was just a movie which is full of lies and innacuracies, why not let the movie go? Why not let President Kennedy rest. It's over and done with right? That happenned a long time ago. Why not move on?
In my humble opinion, it is because they can't let it go. As Shakespeare put it in one of his plays, "The queen pleadeth too much.[her innocence of murder]". As with other such "documentaries", there is no one to disagree with the lone gunman theory being hammerred into our heads yet again. Why is someone with another opinion never allowed in these "documentaties". If you're going to attack the movie JFK, why not have at least one writer, producer, actor or director there to defend it or to admit that it was just a movie. Are the "experts" afraid to even face an actor? Is their bullshit so blatant that even Kevin Costner can stomp them into the ground in a fair debate? There is no one to state what is being omitted, and what is just pure, unadulterated BULL SHIT.
Just for shits and giggles, lets discuss some of their alleged proof!
One bit of allegedly irrefutable evidence is an old brown book that is supposed to be the very same scorebook used to record Oswald's performance at a USMC shooting range. It describes almost excellent marksmanship. They even go on to say that the USMC basic target of the time resembles the head and shoulders of a man as one would see in a car from the rear. What they left out is the simple fact that the vehicle was moving and targets on shooting ranges where basic infantry types hone their skills do not move. I'm telling you this as an ex military officer by the way. Range to a target is always critical. Even the most basic infantry rifles have some way to set in the range to the target to correct for the distance a bullet drops downward as it moves toward the target. As a target moves away, you must reset the sight to get any chance at hitting your target in addition to dealing with correcting for any left or right drift with a proper lead. Also, Marines, even back then, used well maintained semi auto rifles, not old Italian bolt action rifles, at the range. Semi auto rifles do not require loss of the sight picture to the degree that bolt action rifles do between shots. Only a marine sniper would need to demonstrate skill to that degree with a bolt action rifle, and Oswald was not a sniper, just a guard at an air base.
Another "proof positive" for the lone gunman lie was the common assertion that one person cannot fire three well aimed rounds in the time allotted. The "expert" demonstrated the ease with which a bolt action rifle could indeed be fired rapidly by dry firing the weapon in a short amount of time. The omissions are blatantly obvious. The weapon was not firing rifle rounds. So the "expert" wasn't dealing with rifle recoil which destroys the sight picture. His upper body was not positioned as a rifleman would be to deal with recoil, but in a casual way which made it much easier for him to cycle the bolt. There was no target, so the "expert" wasn't having to reaquire a sight picture which is completely lost as a rifleman lifts his head or lowers the rifle to cycle the bolt. Also, the "expert" never reset the scope (which wasn't present) for the increased range of the target that the actual gunman allegedly was shooting at.
Here is a better documentary. http://www.archive.org/details/Bush_JFK_Zapruder
As with all such propaganda being distributed falsely as a documentary, the use of the word conspiracy is overused. The definition of conspiracy, according to the Websters and Random House dictionaries is " a plan or agreement formulated, especially in secret, by two or more persons to commit an unlawful, harmful, or treacherous act." The CIA, or whatever inhuman bastards keep producing these lies about 911 and the JFK murder would have you believe that there is another definition for conspiracy. In their opinion, conspiracy is defined as the insane ramblings of any individual who is not a complete automaton and who does not repeat and accept as irrefutable truth any lies issued by those in power.
Why doesn't the documentary mention that JFK fired the head of the CIA for invading another country without the presiden't permission. That's a pretty big 500 pound gorilla/ elephant in the room to ignore, don't you think?
The documentary repeatedly stated that no proof of a conspiracy exists. I beg to differ. The simple fact that there has to be another documentary every year restating the same lies over and over like a broken record is proof that there are very powerful people who are depending upon our ignorance for their prosperity, if not their survival. These people are involved in some way, however remote. So, according to their own admission, Oswald was one person. So, if there is yet another person or persons who ensures that this bullshit hits the airwaves to keep us pacified and stupid year after year, that makes two people. According to the dictionaries I mentioned above, that equals a conspiracy. The American people know the truth about the JFK murder. The thruth about 911 will not be accepted with the same passivity. Scroll down to my latest 911 truth entry and see loose change 1 and 2 if you don't know the truth about 911 yet.
In my humble opinion, it is because they can't let it go. As Shakespeare put it in one of his plays, "The queen pleadeth too much.[her innocence of murder]". As with other such "documentaries", there is no one to disagree with the lone gunman theory being hammerred into our heads yet again. Why is someone with another opinion never allowed in these "documentaties". If you're going to attack the movie JFK, why not have at least one writer, producer, actor or director there to defend it or to admit that it was just a movie. Are the "experts" afraid to even face an actor? Is their bullshit so blatant that even Kevin Costner can stomp them into the ground in a fair debate? There is no one to state what is being omitted, and what is just pure, unadulterated BULL SHIT.
Just for shits and giggles, lets discuss some of their alleged proof!
One bit of allegedly irrefutable evidence is an old brown book that is supposed to be the very same scorebook used to record Oswald's performance at a USMC shooting range. It describes almost excellent marksmanship. They even go on to say that the USMC basic target of the time resembles the head and shoulders of a man as one would see in a car from the rear. What they left out is the simple fact that the vehicle was moving and targets on shooting ranges where basic infantry types hone their skills do not move. I'm telling you this as an ex military officer by the way. Range to a target is always critical. Even the most basic infantry rifles have some way to set in the range to the target to correct for the distance a bullet drops downward as it moves toward the target. As a target moves away, you must reset the sight to get any chance at hitting your target in addition to dealing with correcting for any left or right drift with a proper lead. Also, Marines, even back then, used well maintained semi auto rifles, not old Italian bolt action rifles, at the range. Semi auto rifles do not require loss of the sight picture to the degree that bolt action rifles do between shots. Only a marine sniper would need to demonstrate skill to that degree with a bolt action rifle, and Oswald was not a sniper, just a guard at an air base.
Another "proof positive" for the lone gunman lie was the common assertion that one person cannot fire three well aimed rounds in the time allotted. The "expert" demonstrated the ease with which a bolt action rifle could indeed be fired rapidly by dry firing the weapon in a short amount of time. The omissions are blatantly obvious. The weapon was not firing rifle rounds. So the "expert" wasn't dealing with rifle recoil which destroys the sight picture. His upper body was not positioned as a rifleman would be to deal with recoil, but in a casual way which made it much easier for him to cycle the bolt. There was no target, so the "expert" wasn't having to reaquire a sight picture which is completely lost as a rifleman lifts his head or lowers the rifle to cycle the bolt. Also, the "expert" never reset the scope (which wasn't present) for the increased range of the target that the actual gunman allegedly was shooting at.
Here is a better documentary. http://www.archive.org/details/Bush_JFK_Zapruder
As with all such propaganda being distributed falsely as a documentary, the use of the word conspiracy is overused. The definition of conspiracy, according to the Websters and Random House dictionaries is " a plan or agreement formulated, especially in secret, by two or more persons to commit an unlawful, harmful, or treacherous act." The CIA, or whatever inhuman bastards keep producing these lies about 911 and the JFK murder would have you believe that there is another definition for conspiracy. In their opinion, conspiracy is defined as the insane ramblings of any individual who is not a complete automaton and who does not repeat and accept as irrefutable truth any lies issued by those in power.
Why doesn't the documentary mention that JFK fired the head of the CIA for invading another country without the presiden't permission. That's a pretty big 500 pound gorilla/ elephant in the room to ignore, don't you think?
The documentary repeatedly stated that no proof of a conspiracy exists. I beg to differ. The simple fact that there has to be another documentary every year restating the same lies over and over like a broken record is proof that there are very powerful people who are depending upon our ignorance for their prosperity, if not their survival. These people are involved in some way, however remote. So, according to their own admission, Oswald was one person. So, if there is yet another person or persons who ensures that this bullshit hits the airwaves to keep us pacified and stupid year after year, that makes two people. According to the dictionaries I mentioned above, that equals a conspiracy. The American people know the truth about the JFK murder. The thruth about 911 will not be accepted with the same passivity. Scroll down to my latest 911 truth entry and see loose change 1 and 2 if you don't know the truth about 911 yet.
posted by WILD BILL at 1:22 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home